The following post wasn't approved to be put in the correct thread:|
Previously I used the wrong sub-forum and posted a link to a controversial review of the Hi13, which was followed up with responses from other users: http://forum.chuwi.com/thread-3660-1-1.html
I've contacted igeekphone.com by email, and I also asked subsequent questions based on Sam's feedback. You can find the email interaction thus far here below.
Thank you for your helpful feedback.
I'll update the forum with it. And I've now a few new important questions based on your feedback.
1. Does that mean there is a fake Chuwi Hi13 tablet out there on the market?
2. But how can then the rest of the review also about the keyboard for example be correct if the Hi13 that REYAN SIDDIQUI reviewed was fake?
3. From where did he get it from? It's important to warn other (potential) Chuwi buyers to watchout for the source of the fake tablet.
Thanks again in advance.
On Feb 27, 2017 4:04 AM, "info" <email@example.com> wrote:
sorry for this article, we have confirmed from Chuwi, the keyboard is metal, we have corrected it. When we got the real tablet, then make a detailed review.
thx for your kind understanding.
------------------ Original ------------------
From: "Zen Balancer"<>;
Date: Sat, Feb 25, 2017 08:18 AM
Subject: Your Hi13 review and comparison
It's about your article:
https://www.igeekphone.com/chuwi ... res-battery-review/
We need a statement as (potential) customers of Chuwi at their forum.
Is it true that the above article is written based on a Chuwi Hi13 that you or the reviewer has or had somehow?
There is some speculation that your article is the result of a bot. Because there is no picture proof of having a Hi13 that you reviewed. And the language if not from an automated translator, might be also a sign that it's not a legitimate article. Please comment on this.
If it's okay with you, I'll post your answer and comment to the forum:
http://forum.chuwi.com/forum.php ... e=1&extra=#pid19942
Thank you in advance.